11/21/2024 / By Ethan Huff
As many suspected might be the case, The Onion‘s purchase of Alex Jones’ Infowars site at a recent auction was fraudulent.
The whole thing was rigged, we now know, to award the popular media platform to a left-wing satire outlet that has been irrelevant for years. None of it made any sense since there was a higher bid, not to mention the fact that nobody knows how much The Onion actually even paid for Infowars.
Jeffrey Clark, director of litigation at the Center for Renewing America and former official at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), joined War Room this week to discuss the last-minute changes that were made by the trustee to hold a secret auction and arbitrarily declare whoever he or she wanted as the winner.
Watch below as Clark discusses the matter with Jones himself at the Alex Jones Network:
BREAKING: Corrupt DOJ’s Criminal Actions Against Alex Jones To Be Investigated By Trump DOJ
WATCH THE LIVE SHOW HERE:https://t.co/xu3E0UuPke pic.twitter.com/Qr4ciut9GL
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) November 16, 2024
(Related: Be sure to check out our earlier report about how Infowars went down almost immediately after The Onion purchased it, although the site is back online [for now, at least].)
The matter that triggered all this, at least publicly, was Jones’ treatment of the events of Sandy Hook from 2012. Jones questioned the official government narrative about Sandy Hook and later paid the price in the form of a lawsuit.
In addition to being ordered to pay $1.5 billion in damages to the Sandy Hook families as a settlement, Jones also had his Infowars platform ripped away from him in the fraudulent auction.
“Maybe we should have a deep investigation into every single participant in Sandy Hook,” one commenter suggested about a common-sense way we can get to the bottom of the scandal once and for all.
“It’s amazing how much they want Alex Jones destroyed and off the air,” wrote another. “I thought he was just a ‘conspiracy theorist.’ That’s what Wikipedia calls his website.”
“All this money, lawsuits, and lawfare being thrown around by the corrupt DOJ. What are they so worried about?”
Another pointed out that at the very least, Jones should have been allowed to declare bankruptcy, “but since they used the color of law, conspired together to extort and destroy him. May they all lose their license to practice law.”
The Jones trial is available as a documentary on HBO, but not everyone is buying it. One skeptic asked if “we are all being played” after observing a strange anomaly with someone at the trial who was “dressed up as a woman.”
“So all the money from the Remington lawsuit, Infowars‘ sale, and the millions in donations from fundraising and charities including the United Way all went to the Sandy Hook families?” asked another.
“More than likely this Infowars sale to the bankrupt Onion will spur a DOJ investigation and audit into where all the money went. The new rightful buyer has the right to know.”
Another could not help but notice that this whole thing feels like it is “turning into a soap opera.” And Jones is being surprisingly kind towards his enemies, all things considered.
The Donald J. Trump press release account on X / Twitter (@TrumpTrainX) tweeted some encouragement to Jones, giving him credit for having the guts to “hold the corrupt DOJ accountable.”
“Trump’s DOJ will get to the bottom of this,” the account promised.
“Men like Wray and Garland should not be able to destroy justice so easily,” wrote another.
More related news coverage can be found at Corruption.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
Alex Jones, conspiracy, corruption, deception, deep state, DOJ, Donald Trump, First Amendment, free speech, InfoWars, Lawfare, media, progress, retaliatory, Sandy Hook, speech, Trump
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Trump.News is a fact-based public education website published by Trump News Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2018 by Trump News Features, LLC.
Contact Us with Tips or Corrections
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.