Biden grants BLANKET PARDON to ANTHONY FAUCI for crimes he and his co-conspirators have yet to be charged for

01/21/2025 / By Lance D Johnson

President Biden has issued a sweeping preemptive pardon for Dr. Anthony Fauci and others government officials, in a desperate attempt to shield them from future investigations or prosecutions.
The move has drawn sharp criticism, with critics accusing Biden of undermining accountability and making a mockery of the rule of law.
Fauci, a polarizing figure whose policy directives cost people their lives and livelihoods, is now shielded from legal scrutiny, raising questions about transparency and public trust.
The pardons come amid growing resentment toward the political establishment, with many viewing the act as a tacit admission of guilt.

Biden’s preemptive pardon of Anthony Fauci sparks public outrage, making a mockery of the U.S. judicial system

In the fleeting, final days of his presidency, Joe Biden has ignited a firestorm of controversy by issuing a sweeping preemptive pardon for Dr. Anthony Fauci, General Mark Milley, and other key figures in his administration. The move, unprecedented in its scope, shields these individuals from potential future investigations or prosecutions, even as serious questions linger about their actions during pivotal moments in recent U.S. history.

The decision, announced in a lengthy statement from the White House, has been met with widespread outrage, particularly among those seeking justice for vaccine injuries, remdesivir related deaths, and job losses that were the direct result of authoritarian vaccine mandates and lockdown polices that were imposed by Fauci and his co-conspirators.

While presidential pardons are traditionally granted to individuals convicted of crimes, Biden’s use of the power to preemptively absolve those who have not even been formally accused of wrongdoing marks a dramatic departure from precedent. Public officials should be held to a stronger standard of accountability, not less.

For Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s former top infectious disease expert, the pardon represents a shield from potential legal fallout related to his handling of the COVID-19 scandal, where he lied to Congress about his agency’s involvement in funding gain-of-function, bio-weapons research in Wuhan, China.

Fauci, who served as a key advisor to both Biden and former President Trump, routinely misled the public on the potential of laboratory leaks, suppressing dissenting scientific opinions, and contributing to policies that caused widespread economic and social harm.

A controversial legacy of medical authoritarianism and mass death

Dr. Fauci’s tenure as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) spanned over five decades, during which he played a central role in mis-managing the government’s response to numerous public health crises, including HIV/AIDS, Ebola, and Zika. However, it was his handling of the COVID-19 scandal that cemented his status as one of the most polarizing, authoritarian figures in modern American history.

Health freedom advocates argue that Fauci’s shifting guidance on masks, his role in funding (and covering up) controversial gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China, and his dismissal of alternative treatments for COVID-19 eroded public trust. His defenders, meanwhile, credit him with saving countless lives and guiding the nation through an unprecedented crisis, even though there is no evidence to support these opinions. School closures, threats to parental rights, discriminatory business closures, unlawful mask and vaccine mandates all caused further damage to people’s lives. The suppression of early treatments and Fauci’s mandate for remdesivir (despite knowing it’s high fatality rate in previous Ebola studies), pose an ongoing threat to public health and safety.

A tacit admission of guilt, and precedence for further investigation of all involved

Legal experts have noted that the acceptance of a pardon carries an implicit acknowledgment of wrongdoing, even if no formal charges have been filed. This principle, established by the Supreme Court in Burdick v. United States (1915), suggests that those who accept pardons are effectively admitting guilt, as the act is intended to absolve individuals of legal consequences.

In his statement, however, Biden laughably emphasized that the pardons should not be interpreted as an admission of guilt. “The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing,” Biden (or his handlers) wrote.

Imagine the level of resentment Fauci’s co-conspirators and colleague will have, when they are charged with the same crimes Fauci committed and orchestrated from the top down!

In issuing these preemptive pardons, Biden thinks he has shielded his allies from legal consequences, but he has really just deepened the divide between the political establishment and the American public, setting up countless public health officials to take the fall for Fauci’s crimes against humanity. The move underscores a troubling reality: that those in power often operate by a different set of rules, immune to the accountability that governs the rest of society.

For Dr. Anthony Fauci, the pardon may offer a reprieve for now, but it does little to repair the damage to his reputation or restore public trust. For the sake of protecting future generations, may Fauci’s authoritarian legacy of false virtue, death, and destruction be damned eternally. Alive or dead, Fauci will be remembered for a myriad of social and societal harms, and a genocide.