US departs from the World Health Organization – cutting off a predatory, global oligarchy that has destroyed public health for billions

• The U.S. formally announced its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), citing mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic and disproportionate financial contributions.
• The move sets a 12-month notice period, during which the U.S. will cease funding and participation in WHO programs.
• Those who like to be subjugated by unlawful mandates argue the decision undermines international cooperation and public health initiatives.
• Health freedom advocates view the departure as a necessary step to reclaim national sovereignty and reform global health governance.
• The Biden administration had previously halted a similar withdrawal attempt in 2021, but the WHO’s proposed “pandemic treaty” in 2024 reignited concerns over centralized power and global vaccine mandates.

A fractured relationship of coverups and human rights abuses

The United States has officially begun its withdrawal from the World Health Organization, marking a significant shift in its approach to global health governance. President Donald Trump announced the decision on Monday, accusing the WHO of mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and failing to act independently from the influence of member states, particularly China.

“World Health ripped us off, everybody rips off the United States. It’s not going to happen anymore,” Trump said during the signing of an executive order. The move, which follows years of tension between the U.S. and the WHO, sets a 12-month notice period for the withdrawal to take effect.

The WHO, which relies heavily on U.S. funding—contributing approximately 18% of its $6.8 billion budget—expressed regret over the decision. “We hope that the United States will reconsider, and we really hope that there will be constructive dialogue for the benefit of everyone, for Americans but also for people around the world,” WHO spokesperson Tarik Jasarevi? said.

The U.S. departure threatens to disrupt critical WHO programs, including HPV, polio, and COVID-19 vaccine programs that are set to continue with seasonal boosters and vaccine campaigns that target various age groups. The departure from WHO could put a damper on contact tracing programs and mass PCR testing fraud, which is used to exploit populations and generate fundraising for future engineered public health crises.

Furthermore, the WHO’s objectives are misguided and do not prioritize the nutritional health needs of vulnerable populations. Instead, WHO pushes more vaccine programs onto vulnerable population groups, neglecting their needs for clean water systems, sewage, and hygiene. WHO’s idea of medical care is rapid response teams that stick individuals with tests and experimental vaccines, while promising that these experiments are safe and effective. Meanwhile, efficacious treatments for infections disease are forgotten, and nutritive support is abandoned.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WHO’s second-largest donor, has pledged to continue its support, primarily to push out more polio vaccines. This is yet another fraud, live polio vaccine campaigns are causing and spreading a new type of vaccine-derived polio, especially in immunocompromnised children.

Germany, the next-largest state donor to WHO, has also voiced concerns. German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach expressed hope that the U.S. would reverse its decision, stating, “We believe in the importance of multilateral cooperation, especially in times of global health crises.” Of course, Germany was one of many countries where a large swatch of the population rose up against vaccine passport systems. So, Lauterbach is delusional, to say the least.

Restoring national and personal health sovereignty

The U.S. withdrawal from WHO comes amid ongoing negotiations over the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty, formally known as the “WHO Convention, Agreement or Other International Instrument on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response”. The treaty aims to centralize pandemic response under the WHO, granting it regulatory powers to declare health emergencies and enforce international public health policies.

Health freedom and healthcare reform advocates argue that the treaty could undermine national sovereignty by allowing the WHO to impose measures such as vaccine mandates, digital health certificates, and intellectual property waivers during man-made pandemics. The treaty also includes provisions for the WHO to combat “misinformation” and “disinformation,” raising concerns about free speech and government overreach. No sane and independent individual wants a global body of technocrats controlling the internet and hauling people off to camps for dissenting to and expressing the truth about harmful vaccines and other totalitarian government measures.

As the world grapples with the lingering effects of the COVID-19 scam and prepares for future manufactured health crises, the debate over the WHO’s role and authority is far from over. However, the U.S. decision is not likely to spur meaningful reform, and WHO will continue to exploit populations.

Sources include:

Reuters.com

TimesofIsrael.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com