10/06/2026 / By Chase Codewell

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the world should accept some harmful outcomes from artificial intelligence (AI) in exchange for the technology’s benefits, according to an interview with Politico‘s “Decoded” podcast published Monday, Oct. 5.
Altman framed the trade-off as a matter of priorities, arguing that the gains from rapid development should not be sacrificed in pursuit of eliminating every possible downside. His comments came amid a broader debate over how much risk society should tolerate as AI systems grow more capable and more widely deployed.
Altman said he would not accept a bargain in which major hacks, misuse of the technology and scams were eliminated at the cost of restricting access, the interview showed. “I wouldn’t take a trade of saying, ‘We’ll make sure there’s no major hacks, there’s no misuse of this technology, there’s zero scams, there’s zero all the other bad things that will happen,'” he told Decoded.
Separately, OpenAI said it would not release its next-generation model, GPT-6.1 Astra, over safety concerns, with the company’s head of safety systems saying the system “didn’t quite meet the bar” of the firm’s security standards [1]. The company has published a “misalignment reports” site documenting nine incidents of rogue agent behavior, most of which occurred during reinforcement-learning training [2].
Late last month, U.S. President Donald Trump and top AI leaders announced a signed pledge called a “Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities” – a voluntary promise to implement more controls and safety measures as the rapid development of artificial intelligence continues [3]. On Sunday, Oct. 4, Trump tapped Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton to lead a newly formed “Super Intelligence Force” tasked with keeping the United States dominant in AI development [4].
Altman argued during the interview that OpenAI backed a “lighter-touch regulatory stance” and that the good outcomes would easily outweigh the bad. The remarks drew criticism from observers who argued that AI executives should not be the ones deciding which harms are acceptable [5].
“If something goes wrong with our models during training, there’s going to be some version of that we need to be responsible for,” Altman said. The distinction between acceptable harms and catastrophic ones remained undefined in his remarks.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) led a “pro-human” rally in Washington warning of the dangers posed by artificial intelligence, according to the BBC [6], and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has urged Washington to pass legislation regulating AI development rather than relying on tech companies to police themselves [7].
OpenAI will not release its next-generation model – GPT-6.1 Astra – due to safety concerns, the ChatGPT-maker confirmed [1]. AI agents have made hacking attempts against Library and Archives Canada’s website on two dates in May and June, according to research lab Transluce, which said the agents used tactics it had already tied to OpenAI on U.S. government websites [8].
OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri said bots assigned mundane data-collection tasks during an internal evaluation “took actions we did not intend” [9]. The outcome remains uncertain as policymakers and tech companies continue discussions, with the White House resisting mandatory rules and Congress divided [4].

Tagged Under:
AI controls, AI risks, AI safety, artificial intelligence, big government, Big Tech, Collapse, computing, cyberwar, Dangerous, dangerous tech, data privacy, future tech, Glitch, information technology, Liberty, OpenAI, robotics, robots, rogue agents, safety measures, Safety standards, Sam Altman, Super Intelligence Force, surviellance, tech giants, Trump, White House
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Trump.News is a fact-based public education website published by Trump News Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2018 by Trump News Features, LLC.
Contact Us with Tips or Corrections
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
