10/19/2026 / By Chase Codewell

Last September, President Donald Trump dismissed calls for AI safeguards as a “hoax.”
His remarks came as executives at leading AI companies publicly called for a slower pace of development and as lawmakers in both parties weighed requests for new federal oversight.
The remarks were consistent with a broader administration posture that treats rapid AI buildout as a contest with China. Trump later reiterated the point in a post about his planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, writing that “Our guardrail is the DOJ!” [1].
The administration subsequently named Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton to lead a new “Super Intelligence Force,” a move that kept Clayton in his intelligence post while charging him with steering AI strategy [2].
Not everyone in the industry shares that assessment. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in a Sept. 17 interview with CBS News that there is a “zero percent chance” that AI will cause human extinction by 2030, dismissing the warnings as “doomsday narratives” that are not grounded in science [3].
The split has left lawmakers and regulators to weigh competing claims from the same industry, and to sort out which warnings reflect genuine technical concern and which reflect competitive positioning [4].
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., later said the United States does not need a moratorium on AI, telling Fox Business Network that a meeting with industry CEOs would aim to “strike the right balance” between innovation and oversight [5] [13].
More than 100 House Democrats signed a letter on Sept. 16 asking Johnson to cancel the chamber’s upcoming recess and keep lawmakers in Washington until Congress passes safeguards on advanced AI, writing that “We cannot disagree about the imperative for Congress to act [6].”
Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said AI regulation would not be feasible until after the November elections [13].
Vice President JD Vance also questioned the motives behind the industry’s appeal. “It feels a little bit to me like a bit of a Trojan horse,” he said [13].
On the other hand, former President Barack Obama called the industry slowdown a “good and necessary first step” and said voluntary standards were not enough [13].
The Chinese response came as the two governments competed for leadership in advanced chips and critical materials, with Jinping saying both countries have the capability and the responsibility to develop and manage AI for good [7].
Meanwhile, critics outside Washington have questioned whether the safety push amounts to a regulatory moat for incumbent firms. Independent journalist Maria Zeee has alleged that recent safety warnings from AI leaders are a calculated strategy to restrict public access to advanced AI while allowing developers to expand their own surveillance and control systems [8].
The gap between the president’s public position and the polling has made data centers a flashpoint in midterm races, where some candidates backing the AI boom have lost primaries to challengers calling for guardrails [9].
Trump remained undeterred, saying in a later post that “AI taking over the World, destroying Humanity, and all other things bad, is a HOAX [10] [13].” The following week, he and industry leaders signed a voluntary “accord” on AI standards at the White House that Trump described as “a constitution, in a way [11].”
Critics said the accord did little to address the absence of binding guardrails, with governance scholar Tom Wheeler noting that “sincerity does not abolish self-interest [12].”
Tagged Under:
AI dangers, AI guardrails, Anthropic, artificial intelligence, biased, big government, Big Tech, chaos, Collapse, computing, Dangerous, Dario Amodei, Donald Trump, future tech, Glitch, Globalism, information technology, national security, Resist, robots, super intelligence, tech giants, technocrats, Trump, White House
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Trump.News is a fact-based public education website published by Trump News Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2018 by Trump News Features, LLC.
Contact Us with Tips or Corrections
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
