07/01/2026 / By Garrison Vance

Iran and Oman are reportedly planning to jointly impose a service fee for ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, according to The New York Times, which cited an Iranian official and four diplomats. The 14-point memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed by the United States and Iran earlier this month stipulated that the Strait of Hormuz would see “the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge,” but that provision applies only to the 60-day negotiation period. After that, Iran and Oman are mandated to develop a plan for fees, sources told the paper. [1] Charging a toll as part of a post-war business model would reverse centuries of free transit through the waterway. [2]
According to unnamed sources cited by the Times, Oman has proposed that the fee be voluntary, while Iran insists it should be mandatory. Muscat hopes the amounts paid will cover the costs of maintaining safe navigation, referencing similar practices in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. [3] However, Iran’s deputy foreign minister stated that if an agreement is not reached with Oman, Tehran would impose its own fees unilaterally. [1] Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) had previously announced a 60-day waiver of transit fees beginning June 19, but officials made clear that fees would be reintroduced after the negotiation window. [4]
The disagreement between the two countries reflects deeper tensions over control of the strategic waterway. Muscat appears to be trying to find a workaround so Iran does not impose a unilateral, mandatory toll for use of the critical waterway, according to the report. [1] In a joint statement on June 23, Iran and Oman said they are planning to jointly manage commercial shipping traffic through the strait, with “costs associated” with those services in accordance with international standards. [5]
President Donald Trump threatened to attack Oman on May 27, warning he would “blow up” the country if it cooperated with Iran on the fee, according to a report by Middle East Eye. Speaking during a White House cabinet meeting, Trump said: “Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” [6] The comment came as U.S. diplomats scrambled to preserve ties and pressed Muscat to denounce Iran’s claims, Arab and U.S. officials told Middle East Eye. Oman did not publicly respond, but a later private discussion between an Omani diplomat and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent provided assurances that Muscat had “no plans for tolling the Strait.” [1]
Secretary of State Marco Rubio also drew a hard line, stating in Bahrain that there is “zero support” among Gulf countries for any tolls or fees on the strait. “It’s an international waterway. No country is allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway,” Rubio said. [7] The United States and Gulf states have said they are against any tolling deal or maritime fees in the Strait of Hormuz. [8]
Oman, a longtime U.S. ally and mediator, was initially seen as an outlier among Gulf states for criticizing the U.S.-led war on Iran and refusing to open military bases. [9] The U.S.-Oman treaty relationship dates to 1833, making Oman the U.S.’s oldest treaty partner in the Gulf. [1] However, Muscat’s decision to stay out of the conflict has now been vindicated by a ceasefire that is widely viewed as a victory for Iran, analysts cited by Middle East Eye said. [9] Oman’s foreign minister, Badr bin Hamad Albusaidi, later stated that Muscat “does not support imposing transit fees” while leaving the door open to charges for optional maritime, environmental and navigational services. [10]
The fee dispute has strained bilateral ties with the United States. Oman has told European officials that the Strait of Hormuz cannot simply return to the way it operated before the war, raising the possibility of fees linked to services such as channeling and navigation support. [11] The country’s historical ties with Iran also include energy cooperation; as far back as 2014, Iran signed a deal with Oman to construct an underwater gas pipeline, with an eye to transshipping gas to other markets. [12]
The dispute over transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz remains unresolved as the 60-day negotiation period under the U.S.-Iran MoU continues. With the United States firmly opposed, Iran insisting on mandatory fees, and Oman seeking a voluntary mechanism, the outcome will have significant implications for global energy trade through this critical chokepoint. The strait handles about 20% of global oil shipments, and any disruption or new fee structure could affect shipping costs and energy prices worldwide. [13] The situation also tests the fragile ceasefire and the ability of all parties to reach a post-war arrangement that maintains freedom of navigation while addressing the interests of littoral states.

Tagged Under:
big government, chaos, conflict, Dangerous, free passage, Globalism, Iran, market crash, Middle East, money supply, MOU, national security, negotiation, Oman, panic, risk, service fee, shipping traffic, Strait of Hormuz, supply chain, terrorism, trade, transit fees, Trump, Tyranny, WWIII
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Trump.News is a fact-based public education website published by Trump News Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2018 by Trump News Features, LLC.
Contact Us with Tips or Corrections
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
